According to Michael L. Hitch:
> 
> On Mar 17, 12:20pm, "Markus Illenseer" wrote:
> >  The other idea which comes to mind is that this register is probably
> > 8Bit-only and the 040-interface in some machines will not access the
> > register correctly.
> 
>   If that is the case, and since the registers appear to be sequential,
> could the above code be modified to do a 16 bit write of the
> byte-swapped values of x and y?  I.e:
> 
> 	*((u_short *)(acm + (ACM_CURSOR_POSITION + 0))) =
> 	    ((x & 0xff) << 8) + ((x >> 8) & 0xff);
> 	*((u_short *)(acm + (ACM_CURSOR_POSITION + 2))) =
> 	    ((y & 0xff) << 8) + ((y >> 8) & 0xff);

Yep, good idea - so I tried it. No difference what so ever. The same byte
is still missing. Sorry :(
-- 

<-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=->
: E-mail: ajo@ludd.luth.se                            Amiga 4000 is it! :
: S-mail: Andreas Johansson, Karhusvagen 5  6:618, 977 54 Lulea, SWEDEN :
:       There are two groups of people I'll _never_ understand:         :
:                     math-professors and women                         :
<-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=->