Subject: Re: gcc
To: Christian E. Hopps <email@example.com>
From: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU>
Date: 02/16/1995 17:49:21
> BTW I imagine that if our tree didn't have C++ code in it (groff is it I
> think) We probably wouldn't ship the C++ version of gcc. Maybe that will
> help clarify the point.
I'd say that this is correct.
getting rid of g++ would be wonderful... no more need for g++,
libg++, include/g++, etc... and, of course, the fact that something
that uses g++ exists in the tree means that any port also has to get
g++ (and groff) working, for it to be considered "fully functional."