Subject: Re: groff update?
To: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
From: None <ragge@ludd.luth.se>
List: tech-userlevel
Date: 02/18/2003 17:19:36
> 
> Thomas Klausner <wiz@netbsd.org> writes:
> > I agree that we should just switch to the groff-supplied macros.
> > They are written in a much cleaner way and don't have some problems ours
> > have, like the 9-argument limitation.
> 
> Are they GPLed? Our current macros are not.
> 
It sounds like it's better to fix the limitations in our macros instead.

-- Ragge