Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] Ports scheduled for removal in March and April (fwd)
To: None <tech-pkg@netbsd.org>
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 02/25/2004 11:20:44
--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Michal Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> wrote:
> Hubert Feyrer [Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:39:04PM +0100]:
> >=20
> > Maybe we should do some spring-cleaning too? ;)
>=20
> Well, as fredb@ already pointed out, there is some point in removing
> obsolete packages, why not.
>=20
> But, removing packages, which work, are developed, but are only left with=
out
> mainteance?

I don't believe anybody suggested this.  The FreeBSD announcement said
something to the extent of ``if this package is broken, no patches to
fix it are send-pr'd and there's no maintainer''.  This, together with a
reasonable grace period seems perfectly acceptable to me.

-Jan

--=20
Ancient Principle of WYGIWYGAINGW:
What You Get Is What You're Given, And It's No Good Whining.
--Terry Pratchett et al. (The Science of Discworld)

--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAPMtcfFtkr68iakwRApwEAJ0b9UoT3vhxxc6xZ+0gMufe5PsfKQCeNgLK
SU9BBrs0NPGIr4tr+U2AZVc=
=T9+C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig--