Subject: Re: IPFilter IPv6 configuration
To: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-net
Date: 04/06/2005 15:23:34
--M9kwpIYUMbI/2cCx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:07:44AM -0400, Miles Nordin wrote:
> >>>>> "dr" =3D=3D Darren Reed <darrenr@NetBSD.org> writes:
>=20
>     dr> One other question, if NAT were to support IPv6 also,
>=20
> WHAT!  who is asking you for IPv6 NAT?

NAT is useful for a number of things, not all of which go away when
the resource-shortage addressing issues of v4 are taken away. =20

NAT can be useful as part of load balancing and fail-over solutions,
as just one class of examples.

--
Dan.

--M9kwpIYUMbI/2cCx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCU3JWEAVxvV4N66cRAuuTAJ9BBAPMdYTjmrKIPR8QSz3n5N4KCgCfRoLB
dDN+ECTrSXqFXCrF9BOf1bs=
=B7dv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--M9kwpIYUMbI/2cCx--