Re: Consistent WARN_REFERENCES for assembler

To: tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Consistent WARN_REFERENCES for assembler
From: David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:23:59 +0000

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 07:43:38AM -0500, Allen Briggs wrote:
> 
> Should these be conditional on tools that understand .gnu.warning, or
> are we assuming that if we use alternative tools, they should understand
> .gnu.warning?  Or does it not matter?

At a guess the unknown section will be treated as loadable data.
What the linker does will largely depend on the linker script (or equiv).

        David

-- 
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost

References:
- Consistent WARN_REFERENCES for assembler
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Consistent WARN_REFERENCES for assembler
  - From: Allen Briggs

Prev by Date: Re: locking around LFS_{SET,CLR}_UINO
Next by Date: Re: freebsd 5.99.41 as XEN3_DOMU
Previous by Thread: Re: Consistent WARN_REFERENCES for assembler
Next by Thread: cngetc and watchdogs
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index