>>>>> On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:05:34 -0700,
      Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org> said:

>> this is false.  we have added more info to several sysctl's that
>> could have been ioctl's and it did not require versioning the
>> interface.  see KERN_PROC2.

> I was pretty much speaking about ioctls.

How ioctls differ from sysctl?
It's just same with sysctl from this point of view.
i.e. You can just assign different ioctl number.
-- 
soda