On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, matthew green wrote:
> you're about the Nth person to discover this recently :-)  there appears
> to be nothing inherent that would cause this to fail and netbsd seems to
> work just fine.. 40 vs 75 is the largest difference i've seen so far.

Leet. :)


>    While on the subject: when running with two SM40(?) modules, they were
>    both recognized (cpu0 & cpu1), but the kernel didn't try to boot the
>    secondary cpu for SMP operation. Maybe that'd be worth trying?
>
> you mean that it probed 'cpu0: ... & cpu1: ...' but when it came to saying
> 'cpu0: booting secondary processors: cpu1' it didn't say cpu1?  that, from
> what i read of the code, shouldn't be possible...

Hum, I guess I'll put in the CPUs again and send the dmesg output. :)


 - Hubert

-- 
Want to get a clue on IPv6 but don't know where to start? Try this:
* Basics -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/05/24/ipv6_tutorial.html
* Setup  -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/06/01/ipv6_tutorial.html
Of course with your #1 IPv6 ready operating system -> http://www.NetBSD.org/