Subject: Re: Strange libc shared vs. unshared performance
To: Chris G. Demetriou <cgd@alpha.bostic.com>
From: Chuck Cranor <chuck@maria.wustl.edu>
List: port-sparc
Date: 11/13/1994 17:41:50 
>very interesting.  do you have any numbers for dynamic versions?

i did include dynamic numbers ... but i don't guess i labeled it very well,
sorry.  I used the command:

	# time dhry ; time dhry_static
		^           ^
		|           |
		|           +---- cc -O6 -static dhry.c -o dhry_static
                |
                +---- cc -O6 dhry.c -o dhry


let me re-state the results (the number is dhrystones per sec):

		dynamic		-static
CASE1		4940.45		5010.19		! single usr, cache disabled
CASE2		36727		37247.4		! single usr, cache on
CASE3		24138.7		37170		! multiuser, cache on

chuck