At 1:35 PM -0500 12/12/04, Michael wrote:
>> This brings up a good point - should we work towards establishing some QA
>> benchmarks that we measure against whenever we feel we've hit a stable
>> point, beyond straight performance marks?
>
>I'd strongly recommend it - at least for things as basic as our interrupt
>stuff. Bonnie should show if we did something horribly wrong. ( but so far
>it actually increased throughput a little for me )

I wonder if we could get someone to volunteer....