-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Richard Rauch wrote:

>> No, I would argue that Mr. St. Hilaire is taking a position which while
>> quite possibly incorrect is relevant to the thread.  And it certainly
>> seems that your objection to his voicing his position is based on the
>> content of that position.  Am I misunderstanding?
>
>At least insofar as my posts are concerned, yes.

OK, please enlighten me.  When you say

> Stephane: This isn't an appropriate forum for being an MS apologist.

what _are_ you saying?  I would certainly interpret this as saying
``agreeing with MS is not acceptable on this list'', and I think most
readers would do the same...

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8rfGIN71lEcOYcw4RAq4tAKCHLMRRzt4Z/9Hqk+A5G5ubj6SVTQCeJFTB
Z3JDtTYxIT0nGYP6boE1fSs=
=vbPJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----