At 9:40 PM 11/14/94, Lawrence Kesteloot wrote:
>> >You should also forward it to rtfm.mit.edu and perhaps start the process
>> >of making this a USEnet group under comp.sys.mac or comp.unix as A/UX
>> >is?
>>
>> I'd vote yes on a comp.os. group for either general NetBSD discussion
>> and/or one specifically for macBSD. sure would be nicer than a mailing
>> list, aside from propagation delays.
>
>What's wrong with comp.unix.bsd?  The active members on this list monitor
>that group and answer questions on it already.
>
>Certainly a MacBSD group is unwarranted.  If anything, core@netbsd.org
>should make comp.os.netbsd to complement the comp.os.386bsd hierarchy.
>Even that seems unnecessary, though, since comp.unix.bsd has such little
>traffic.

I think that a NetBSD-specific newsgroup would generate more than enough
traffic to justify its creation. It would be nice for it to provide daily
digests of the mailing list traffic, also.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
busy@aloha.com                 
Resident Quack,               "NEVER INSTALL LOTS OF NEW SOFTWARE AT ONCE."
Macintosh Geek                       --Mike Landis, mdl@macbeth.cs.duke.edu