On Mon, 10 Nov 1997 17:48:36 -0800  Jonathan Stone wrote:

> The most direct test of this hypothesis is to find a really fast
> system, install an old NetBSD 1.2F or 1.2G `comp' distribution set,
> and then rebuild more and more of your perl binary with it: first perl
> itself, then libm

Perl is now out of the picture; there is definitely something not
right with libm.so.0.1.  (See my previous post.)

It would be interesting if someone had a 1.2F or 1.2G system and
could provide me:

	- the libm.so.0.1 from the 1.2{F,G} build
	- a libm.so.0.1 built on 1.2{F,G} from -current sources

Giles